Interactive buttons are unavailable in this viewer. Mobile attachment previews sometimes disable JavaScript. To use the demo, serve this HTML as a normal HTTPS webpage and open its link in Safari or Chrome. This is a fictional demonstration only.
Interactive prototype, not a compliance tool. All people, businesses, matches, dates and list entries are fictional. No UK Sanctions List is loaded. Do not enter genuine personal/client data or rely on these results. Screening integration, security and independent validation are not implemented.
Product concept · Oct 2026
Less searching. Better evidence.
One place to organise sanctions screening, document review and an attributable human decision for a law-firm matter.
SAMPLE MATTERS
03
Fictional demonstration cases
SCREENING SOURCE
Synthetic
No live list connected
HUMAN REVIEW
Required
For recorded dispositions
SAMPLE AUDIT TRAIL
Enabled
Session only; no persistence
Sample matter queue
Select a scenario to explore the prototype.
3 demo cases
MATTER / PARTY
DEMO SCENARIO
SCREENING
What this would replace: repetitive manual searching, screenshots, handwritten screening notes and fragmented evidence records. It would not replace independent KYC/ID verification or a solicitor's assessment.
Proposed review workflow
A short, inspectable process. No AI risk percentage.
01Identify the party and matter
02Run versioned sanctions screening
03Surface candidates and aliases
04Human resolves or escalates
05Save dated evidence and rationale
06Re-screen when the list changes
Production sources and integrations (not connected)
Try a fictional case. The engine below searches only a small, deliberately invented dataset to illustrate the user experience.
Party details
Select a scenario or edit the fictional identifiers to demonstrate how review works.
Future production matching: ingest current official UK Sanctions List, retain source/version, compare names and aliases plus corroborating identifiers, log source freshness, and fail closed if the data feed is unavailable. PEP/adverse media and ID verification need separate, assessed providers.
Screening result
Candidates are not legal findings.
Not screened
◎
No simulation run yet
Choose a sample scenario and run screening to display the results and reviewer controls.
Human review and decision record
Required before a review outcome is recorded.
Awaiting review
02 / Supporting evidence
Evidence and verification checklist
Document collection, verification and professional scrutiny are different things. These demo checkboxes illustrate that separation.
Illustrative file checklist
A checked box represents a fictional demonstration action, not a verified document. Real implementations would require secure file storage, provenance, access controls and evidential review.
What Docoply records
01Client statement or declaration
02Identity/address/source documents
03Verification method / provider result
04Reviewer scrutiny and discrepancies
05Rationale and decision timestamp
Not supplied by this demonstration
This prototype does not authenticate passports, perform biometric verification, access bank data, carry out PEP/adverse-media searches, establish source-of-funds legitimacy, analyse sanctions ownership/control, or verify any real client.
03 / Matter-file output
A review that can be evidenced
The report captures the sample screening source, identifiers, candidates and named review decision.